Golden Triangle Speedway
April 21, 2014, 03:02:25 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: SMF - Just Installed!
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: WINGS ON STREET STOCKS?  (Read 5994 times)
bigdog50
Newbie
*
Posts: 840


« Reply #15 on: June 25, 2011, 02:56:00 pm »

Sounds like there trying to combine with super stock lol but like pete said a better tire and a holley 750 and not a two bbl or run any carb u would like and any body style alumn.or steel  Grin Grin hell let them run straight drive then u would see this class take off just saying  Grin Grin Oh back in the day at silsbee when they let them run wings stuart was the only one with no wing and was kicking ass so that wing kills horsepower so in the middle of the season a car was taking a wing off everyweek so i think that would be a waste of MONEY JUST SAYING  Grin Grin Grin Grin
Logged
Andy406
Newbie
*
Posts: 20


« Reply #16 on: June 25, 2011, 04:33:44 pm »

dig up the old 98 99 stock car rules (before they allowed the late model bodies and 3 links) and make them the rules. Best class ever.
Logged
cheviman99x
Newbie
*
Posts: 103


« Reply #17 on: June 25, 2011, 05:02:05 pm »

stuart was NOT the only one in the ss class kicking ass with out a wing u had tracy deny sr. in the #22 u also have corey neil in the #007 without a wing i know there was a few more for sure.
Logged
TRASH
Newbie
*
Posts: 134

Dennis Guillory


« Reply #18 on: June 25, 2011, 05:20:10 pm »

Yaw are geting off track here they are talking about looks not chassis or engine.
Logged
CAGE RATTLER
Newbie
*
Posts: 535


« Reply #19 on: June 25, 2011, 07:16:46 pm »

ALUMINUM BODIES WILL MAKE US LOOK LIKE THE OLD SUPER STOCKS AND THE CARS WILL  LOOK GOOD.WE WILL ALSO SAVE $$$ WITHOUT BUYING A WING AND CHANGING OUR SET UPS..RIGHT? IF WE ARE JUST GOING FOR LOOKS THIS WILL BE THE WAY TO GO.
Logged
redroosterracing
Newbie
*
Posts: 717


« Reply #20 on: June 25, 2011, 08:21:54 pm »

I havent checked yet, but what does an alum. body cost? and how much of a weight difference is it?  I know i heard the difference in the hoods and deck lids ( cause some ARE running them), but what about the entire body.   The way i look at it, is kinda like voting in politics, you just go to the polls and make your selection and live with it. If i dont like the change, I can switch classes(sell car and buy another one) or switch tracks(carry my arse elsewhere) or give it up( sell out and buy me a boat).   I say we put a RED 1 in front of our numbers, that would be different, as if the those 10 inch tires dont give it away.                        JUST MY 02 cents
Logged

The closer to the front you get, the faster the cars are....
RatFink
Newbie
*
Posts: 11


« Reply #21 on: June 25, 2011, 09:43:34 pm »

I think allowing the late model style performance bodies would be a step in the right direction. There has always been something cool about that look. Plus, finding factory body parts for these cars and not spending a small fortune is getting more difficult. Yes the wings would change the look for cheaper then changing the whole body, but a LEGAL engine for this class just doesn't have the nuts to make a wing a real advantage. So, if it isn't an advantage then its just a barn door up there dragging wind....
Logged
David
Newbie
*
Posts: 69



« Reply #22 on: June 25, 2011, 10:07:34 pm »

I SEE THERE IS ALOT OF TALK ABOUT BODYS WINGS TO CHANGE LOOKS WHY NOT ALOW THE OLD SUPERSTOCKLATEMODEL CAR RUN IN SS THEN YOU COULD HAVE YOUR BODYS THE MOTOR IN SS ARE THE SAME AS THE  OLD SUPERSTOCKLATEMODEL  EXCEPT THEY HAD A 4BRRLEAND DART HEADS ECT AND THE SS RUN 2 BRRL WITH DART HEADS ECT THERE IS A NUFF OF THESE CARS STILL OUT THERE    LETS BRING THESE BACK
« Last Edit: June 25, 2011, 10:14:25 pm by David » Logged
Rowdy51
Newbie
*
Posts: 486



« Reply #23 on: June 25, 2011, 11:34:55 pm »

I dont think late model bodys would be to good of a idea because this class already is getting closer to almost being latemodels minus the bodys!
« Last Edit: June 26, 2011, 08:17:07 pm by Rowdy51 » Logged

StreetStock 51
TRASH
Newbie
*
Posts: 134

Dennis Guillory


« Reply #24 on: June 26, 2011, 01:04:37 am »

streetstock is a long way from a true late model 
Logged
David
Newbie
*
Posts: 69



« Reply #25 on: June 26, 2011, 01:52:22 am »

ROWDY, YOUR WRIGHT but SS can run with them CAR SAME MOTOR EXCEPT 2 BRL THEY RAN 4 BRRL  TAKE DIRECT OUT OF THEM  OR GIVE DIRECT TO SS    TRASH WHAT CLASS YOU DRIVE IN JUST ASKING  PS  ( I SAID THE WRONG  NAME SHOULD HAVE SAID  SUPPER STOCK)  SORRRY!
« Last Edit: June 26, 2011, 02:01:18 am by David » Logged
TRASH
Newbie
*
Posts: 134

Dennis Guillory


« Reply #26 on: June 26, 2011, 06:08:43 am »

David I have a stinger. I have intrest in all classes and have built cars,worked as tech, and crew chief for many years.
 My dad started racing in1976 with a 68 chevelle SS been interested and study dirt track ever sense.                                                                                                         
                                                                                                               Dennis Guillory                                                                         
Logged
OhWonRacin
Newbie
*
Posts: 63


« Reply #27 on: June 26, 2011, 07:14:59 pm »

4 bead locks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Makes our cars look good!!!!!!!!!!
Logged
Rowdy51
Newbie
*
Posts: 486



« Reply #28 on: June 26, 2011, 07:58:26 pm »

i agree on the beadlocks beadlocks id rather run beadlocks than regular rims, and id rather be running the hoosiers again
« Last Edit: June 26, 2011, 08:15:02 pm by Rowdy51 » Logged

StreetStock 51
Slickyone
Newbie
*
Posts: 70


« Reply #29 on: June 26, 2011, 10:34:25 pm »

I agree on the 4 beadlocks much eaiser to swap tires, alum. bodies would make a big change to the looks also.The wing will rob horsepower and make it diffcult to get in my shop without taking it off.

Craig
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!